- Update: At least one wakil rakyat has chosen to speak up so we decided to change the title of our post. Guess who it is? No point, as you already know that it is Tony Pua (since no other wakil rakyat really appear to follow these finance issues, let alone speak up)!
- Update: According to this article, the contract has actually been awarded to Colas, instead of the Bombardier-Hartasuma-SNC Lavalin consortium. However, the issues of transparency still stand. See the updated post below!
‘He that pays the piper calls (chooses) the tune’
That phrase is a simple explanation of who has authority in life … it’s often those with the money. TRANSIT takes note that the Finance Ministry (the one “paying the piper”) has ‘called the tune’ for a third time, (overruling a tender-evaluation decision made by Prasarana and awarding contracts to ‘unsuccessful’ companies).
The first time this was done was the selection of the ‘Independent’ Check Engineer for the MRT project. The second time was when the government overruled Prasarana’s pre-qualifications criteria (described as “biased” by Malay-rights group Perkasa).
Now the government has overruled Prasarana’s decision on the Kelana Jaya LRT extension, and [TRANSIT: we should have added “apparently” here] awarded the contract to a consortium of Bombardier, Hartasuma and SNC Lavalin – a decision that will increase the cost of the LRT extension, put an additional burden on Malaysian taxpayers for generations to come, and allow foreign companies and their local partners to profit handily on the backs of the Malaysian public.
Putrajaya overrules Prasarana, takes pricier LRT extension deal (Malaysian Insider, 17 June 2011)
By Jahabar Sadiq
KUALA LUMPUR June 17 — A Finance Ministry committee has ignored the city’s light rail transit LRT operator’s recommendation for the Kelana Jaya line extension project by awarding it to a company whose project price of RM890 million is almost 50 per cent higher than that of the lowest bid.
The Malaysian Insider understands the committee decision was made on Wednesday to hand the electro-mechanical system project to the Hartasuma Sdn Bhd-Bombardier joint-venture which is already facing a heavy penalty for late delivery of the RM1 2 billion 35 four-car sets to Syarikat Prasarana Negara Bhd.
The Bombardier Group was the original supplier of the 35 Mark II Bombardier Advanced Rapid Transit ART two-car trains when the Kelana Jaya line opened in 1998 The first three sets of the four-car trains finally began operation in December 2009 after being delayed from August 2008.
“All bids are technically the same but Prasarana had recommended Ingress Corp Bhd-Balfour Beatty Rail Sdn Bhd which put in a bid of RM610 million the lowest against Hartasuma-Bombardier’s RM890 million which is the highest ” a source told The Malaysian Insider.
Hartasuma is part of the Ara Group which is led by the politically connected Tan Sri Ravindran Menon who is mainly involved in infrastructure projects and now runs the Subang Sky Park.
[TRANSIT: Ironically, he did not think of opening up the Subang Depot to revenue (passenger-carrying) service to take advantage of that potential LRT link.]
The other frontrunner for the project was CMC Engineering Sdn Bhd and UK’s Colas CMC-Colas which had a RM670 million bid for the 17km-long extension from Kelana Jaya to Subang Jaya.
It is learnt the Finance Ministry committee decision has caused some disquiet among Prasarana and its consultants as Hartasuma-Bombardier has also not complied with one condition of the tender issued last year — a 10 per cent limit of liability on potential damages.
“Other bidders complied but Bombardier has refused to agree to the commercial condition. No one knows what is going on.” another source told The Malaysian Insider.
[TRANSIT: No one knows what is going on. Are there any more telling (and scary) words to hear about your own government?]
The industry source familiar with the tender said the bids did not include the price of Bombardier’s proprietary Linear Induction Motor (LIM) rail system that powers the trains.
[TRANSIT: Linear induction means that the train is pulled along by magnets located in the guide rail. Unlike a magnetic levitation system (which also uses linear induction) the Bombardier train rests on wheels.]
“During the tender process Prasarana removed the supply of proprietary equipment from the tender scope to ensure there was fair competition for the bidders ” he said adding the LIM equipment is estimated to cost some RM50 million although Hartasuma-Bombardier have yet to give any quotes.
[TRANSIT: In other words, Prasarana created a fair set of qualifications for the LRT tender by narrowing down the project to the electro-mechanical system. The actual propulsion system is a separate tender. And since the design is proprietary, Bombardier-Hartasuma can charge a princely fee for their propulsion system.]
The source said Prasarana and their consultants have been above board in making the recommendation although the final decision lay with the ministry committee which has the power to approve projects worth more than RM300 million.
“It now appears that the Ministry of Finance is approving Hartasuma-Bombardier’s bid for a premium of RM280 million plus the cost of the LIM rail while accepting less favourable commercial terms ” he added.
[TRANSIT: Why is this Ministry of Finance committee bending over backwards to facilitate Bombardier-Hartasuma? Why did they bend over backwards for MMC-Gamuda? And most importantly, why isn’t anyone standing upright and shouting “NO, this is wrong!]
Prasarana is spending some RM7 billion for the extension of both the Kelana Jaya and Ampang LRT rail networks The Ampang network will be extended by another 17.7km.
[TRANSIT: That’s how much they plan to spend. Expect the final cost to be somewhat higher especially in the face of these sweetheart deals.]
The wholly-owned unit of the Finance Ministry was forced to cave in to pressure from Malay rights groups last month when it revised pre-qualification criteria for several construction packages for the Klang Valley Mass Rapid Transit MRT by allowing joint-ventures or consortiums.
It had on March 30 imposed additional criteria on contractors taking part in the project tender which disallowed them from forming joint ventures or consortiums. Perkasa however accused Prasarana of blocking Bumiputera contractors from participating by enforcing “strict” guidelines that would only benefited “rich non-Bumis” saying that project delivery partner MMC-Gamuda was “looting and monopolising” the project.
The MRT is expected to be the largest-ever construction project in Malaysia and had earlier been estimated to cost between RM36 billion and RM53 billion.
He who pays the piper calls the tune. The truth of the matter, however, is that the rakyat are the ones who are paying the piper. Not Putrajaya, not the Finance Ministry, and not the wakil rakyat. Sadly this message is lost for those “government servants” (who should think of themselves as public servants) for whom bureaucracy & office politics are the most important things.
We were promised that the Malaysian government was a new one, and that it would not allow the mistakes of the past to be repeated. But time after time, we see that the government of Prime Minister Najib has failed to stand to its principles … at least in the area of public transport.
The MRT project and the LRT extensions will go down as projects that cost too much, took too long, and failed to meet the needs of the rakyat thanks to poor planning and lack of consultation. We will remember why these projects were introduced, who stands to gain, and who stands to lose.
2 years ago TRANSIT proposed simple, effective and low-cost solutions to expand public transport in the Klang Valley. These solutions were rejected by the government, the wakil rakyat, and many among the public who did not investigate or do their research or ask questions, but simply gave their approval through inaction and allowed the government to go ahead and do what they wanted.
It’s not that they were wrong – they were sadly convinced that any public transport / infrastructure / mega-project would have to be an improvement on the current situation. Even if it cost too much. Even if it did not meet promises and expectations. Even if people ended up profiting mightily on the backs of the Malaysian people.
Basically, we all got railroaded … and we allowed it to happen.
This passage below really says it all:
The Singapore Straits Times quoted political analysts and industry executives as saying that the “behind-the-scenes intrigue shows how opaque and non-transparent practices that have long characterised large public-sector contract awards remain the order of the day in Malaysia.”
Calling the LRT deal “a strong test case” for Najib’s administration the ST said that the decision to override Prasarana would “likely to dull Kuala Lumpur’s efforts to attract much-needed foreign investment ”.
This is our fear – that despite all the talk and the policy improvements and public relations, when it gets down the real decision-making there really hasn’t been any change.
9 replies on “Putrajaya overrules Prasarana for a third time. (Update #2)”
our MPs currently are too busy in Parliament. so they have to prioritise. politicking is more urgent now.
Too many politics, i’m sick of it…our public transport must be public interest, not a political interest….aduih, pity to Malaysian that have to wait, spend money too much in order to have better transportation…=(
Transitmy Moaz and some people always believe I’m being too skeptical and too extreme and I’m behaving a bit out of hands or shall I say crazy and now you know why. Being fowl mouth and furious to these political idiots or cronies will not do you any good, but being nice and mild manner and hoping solving problems diplomatically with these political/government idiots will certainly lead you nowhere and make you vomit blood for sure. Usually it is very pleasant to talk to high ranking government officers. They know what are they doing, they know what they want and they know what is happening, they will make it sound so nice that things will be done in a people friendly manner and attending to solve the woes and problems but they need you to be patient and give them a bit of time.
But in many occasions their (high ranking government officials/officers) subordinates or especially their subordinates’ subordinates always mess up the whole thing, efforts, works and situations. For example, my father tried to help a local Chinese Buddhist monastery in my hometown to apply for duty free status for its imported refurbishing materials, he submitted all the applications to Custom and Excise Department in Putrajaya, he talked to one of the officers, everything went smooth, that GUY promised my father it will be settled within three months and try to guess what, three months became 3 years!!! Eventually a series of complaints and investigation, the stupid subordinate did not/forgot/misplaced the applications until we could not stand it and we banged the chairs and tables and shouted our lungs out in in their office in Putrajaya and hey miracle, it was done within 3 simple days!!!
OK let’s get back to the public transport issues, but you see what happen now, more and more places (especially more countryside/less populated areas including my hometown Muar, Johor) without/with less public bus service, more bus accidents happened and lives lost, even school bus, tonnes of problems and “mystery” to the BRAND NEW funicular train. Northwest bus service between Segamat and Muar and other inter-distrcts public buses in Muar district are in desperate situations of closing down now.
Even the extension of lrt and the newly mrt projects also aroused a lot of so called “mysteries” and VOMIT BLOOD issues and to the long existing (for two decades already) Touch ‘N’ Go public transport ticketing issues and etc. Well, it seems like there goes your mild manner and polite/diplomatic efforts to rectify the public transport problems or errors. I wish you all the best transitmy, I hope your patient and diplomatic ways of dealing with these government and political goons will really pay off and solve your public transport problems once and for all. I wish you all the best!!!
I just wanna ‘like’ this post but I don’t have a wordpress account. By the way, what was your “simple, effective and low-cost solutions to expand public transport in the Klang Valley”? Could you please re-post it again or send a link to it?
Check the “ideas” section – click on the tab at the top of our blogsite.
Regards, Moaz for TRANSIT
It is disappointing to see the results from a proper tender evaluation being cast aside, and a more expensive option selected. Gives little hope that things are being done on a transparent and fair manner.
you are wrong this time. The project was not awarded yet when the article above was posted here. A UK firm bagged the project.
It is actually good to reseacrh properly rather than give in to political sensational guessing,
Check the story again and compare it with our post.
At issue here is that the government is not following its own standards and policy. We specifically noted that the government has made 3 specific decisions overruling Prasarana (the selection of the ICE, the MRT pre-qualifications, and the Kelana Jaya LRT bid).
We are not wrong, in that despite their apparently choosing to award the contract to another company, the Ministry of Finance committee has still overruled Prasarana’s choice of the lowest bidder.
The article that you linked specifically states that:
What we got wrong what that the company that appears to be getting the contract was different (Colas instead of Bombardier-Hartasuma) – but again, the problem is still the same.
And anyways, how do we know that this week’s Malaysian Insider article with its unconfirmed sources is any more accurate than what was published in The Malaysian Insider last week?
So frankly, we know where we stand and what we are doing – and we are confident with our research (which includes more sources than you might know).
Regards, Moaz for TRANSIT
[…] since the PM already acceded to the demands of Perkasa with respect to the MRT project, who is to say that he will not do the same with […]